Hume v. Bethea

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hume v. Bethea

197 So. 3d 654, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 12878, 2016 WL 4473320

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 25, 2016·No. No. 1D16-1563·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(k) (explaining that a partial final judgment, other than one that disposes of the entire case as to a party, may be appealed prior to entry of the final judg[655] ment disposing of the entire case only if the partial final judgment “disposes of a separate and distinct cause of action that is not interdependent with other pleaded claims”); Jensen v. Whetstine, 985 So.2d 1218, 1220-21 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (dismissing appeal of partial final judgment because there was factual overlap between the claims dismissed by the trial court and the claims that remained pending)..

B.L. THOMAS, WETHERELL, and WINSOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(k) (explaining that a partial final judgment, other than one that disposes of the entire case as to a party, may be appealed prior to entry of the final judg[655] ment disposing of the entire case only if the partial final judgment “disposes of a separate and distinct cause of action that is not interdependent with other pleaded claims”); Jensen v. Whetstine, 985 So.2d 1218, 1220-21 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (dismissing appeal of partial final judgment because there was factual overlap between the claims dismissed by the trial court and the claims that remained pending)..

B.L. THOMAS, WETHERELL, and WINSOR, JJ., concur.

Hume v. Bethea, 197 So. 3d 654, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 12878, 2016 WL 4473320 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

197 So. 3d 654 (Hume v. Bethea) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related