Hume v. Bethea

197 So. 3d 654, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 12878, 2016 WL 4473320
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 25, 2016
DocketNo. 1D16-1563
StatusPublished

This text of 197 So. 3d 654 (Hume v. Bethea) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hume v. Bethea, 197 So. 3d 654, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 12878, 2016 WL 4473320 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(k) (explaining that a partial final judgment, other than one that disposes of the entire case as to a party, may be appealed prior to entry of the final judg[655]*655ment disposing of the entire case only if the partial final judgment “disposes of a separate and distinct cause of action that is not interdependent with other pleaded claims”); Jensen v. Whetstine, 985 So.2d 1218, 1220-21 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (dismissing appeal of partial final judgment because there was factual overlap between the claims dismissed by the trial court and the claims that remained pending)..

B.L. THOMAS, WETHERELL, and WINSOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jensen v. Whetstine
985 So. 2d 1218 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
197 So. 3d 654, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 12878, 2016 WL 4473320, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hume-v-bethea-fladistctapp-2016.