Humboldt Lumber Co. v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad
Opinion
Order of Appellate Term modifying and affirming a judgment of the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Brooklyn, reversed on the law and the facts, judgment of the Municipal Court vacated, and a new trial ordered, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Term to abide the event. Under the facts it was error for the trial court to accept the bill of lading as prima facie evidence that the lumber was in good order when shipped. (U. S. Code, tit. 49, § 101; Orunsten v. N. Y. Central Railroad Co., 179 App. Div. 465 [3d Dept.]; Smith v. New York Central R. R. Co., 43 Barb. 225; Chicago v. N. W. R. Co. v. Stephens Nat. Bank of Fremont, 75 F. [2d] 398; 13 C. J. S. Carriers, § 254, p. 539.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
258 A.D. 797 (Humboldt Lumber Co. v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.