Humble Oil & Refining Company v. S. s.bay Belle, James McConnell Trading as McConnell Fuel Oil Co., and Carmen Santonello, Trading as Santell Linen Service v. Steam Ship John A. Meseck
This text of 324 F.2d 954 (Humble Oil & Refining Company v. S. s.bay Belle, James McConnell Trading as McConnell Fuel Oil Co., and Carmen Santonello, Trading as Santell Linen Service v. Steam Ship John A. Meseck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
324 F.2d 954
HUMBLE OIL & REFINING COMPANY, Appellant,
v.
S. S.BAY BELLE, Appellee.
James McCONNELL, trading as McConnell Fuel Oil Co., and
Carmen Santonello, trading as Santell Linen
Service, Appellants,
v.
STEAM SHIP JOHN A. MESECK, Appellee.
Nos. 9137, 9138.
United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.
Argued Nov. 20, 1963.
Decided Dec. 2, 1963.
Marvin C. Wahl, Baltimore, Md. (Wahl & Wahl, Solomon B. Levin, Baltimore, Md., and Warren, Chasan, Leyner & Holland, Jersey City, N.J., on brief), for appellants.
Samuel D. Slade, Philadelphia, Pa. (David H. Rosenbluth, Gilbert W. Oswald, Stradley, Ronon, Stevens & Young, Philadelphia, Pa., and Schnader, Harrison, Segal & Lewis, Philadelphia, Pa., on brief), for appellees.
Before HAYNSWORTH and BRYAN, Circuit Judges, and BARKSDALE, District judge.
PER CURIAM.
For the reasons set forth in its opinion filed herein, 215 F.Supp. 72 (1963), the judgment of the District Court in this case is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
324 F.2d 954, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/humble-oil-refining-company-v-s-sbay-belle-james-mcconnell-trading-as-ca4-1963.