Humble Oil & Refining Company v. S. s.bay Belle, James McConnell Trading as McConnell Fuel Oil Co., and Carmen Santonello, Trading as Santell Linen Service v. Steam Ship John A. Meseck

324 F.2d 954
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 2, 1963·No. 9138_1·Published

Opinion

324 F.2d 954

HUMBLE OIL & REFINING COMPANY, Appellant,
v.
S. S.BAY BELLE, Appellee.
James McCONNELL, trading as McConnell Fuel Oil Co., and
Carmen Santonello, trading as Santell Linen
Service, Appellants,
v.
STEAM SHIP JOHN A. MESECK, Appellee.

Nos. 9137, 9138.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued Nov. 20, 1963.
Decided Dec. 2, 1963.

Marvin C. Wahl, Baltimore, Md. (Wahl & Wahl, Solomon B. Levin, Baltimore, Md., and Warren, Chasan, Leyner & Holland, Jersey City, N.J., on brief), for appellants.

Samuel D. Slade, Philadelphia, Pa. (David H. Rosenbluth, Gilbert W. Oswald, Stradley, Ronon, Stevens & Young, Philadelphia, Pa., and Schnader, Harrison, Segal & Lewis, Philadelphia, Pa., on brief), for appellees.

Before HAYNSWORTH and BRYAN, Circuit Judges, and BARKSDALE, District judge.

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons set forth in its opinion filed herein, 215 F.Supp. 72 (1963), the judgment of the District Court in this case is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Humble Oil & Refining Company v. S. s.bay Belle, James McConnell Trading as McConnell Fuel Oil Co., and Carmen Santonello, Trading as Santell Linen Service v. Steam Ship John A. Meseck, 324 F.2d 954 (4th Cir. 1963).

324 F.2d 954 (Humble Oil & Refining Company v. S. s.bay Belle, James McConnell Trading as McConnell Fuel Oil Co., and Carmen Santonello, Trading as Santell Linen Service v. Steam Ship John A. Meseck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Port Welcome Cruises, Inc. v. S. S. Bay Belle
215 F. Supp. 72 (D. Maryland, 1963)