Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Male

375 U.S. 43, 84 S. Ct. 148, 11 L. Ed. 2d 107, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 390
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 21, 1963·No. 326·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

375 U.S. 43 (1963)

HUMBLE OIL & REFINING CO. ET AL.
v.
MALE, COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY, NEW JERSEY.

No. 326.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided October 21, 1963.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY.

T. Girard Wharton and John W. Fritz for appellants.

Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, and Theodore I. Botter, First Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Male, 375 U.S. 43, 84 S. Ct. 148, 11 L. Ed. 2d 107, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 390 (1963).

375 U.S. 43 (Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Male) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Public Service Electric & Gas Co. v. Rodriguez
478 A.2d 1231 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1984)
State v. Imperatore
223 A.2d 498 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1966)