Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Male
375 U.S. 43, 84 S. Ct. 148, 11 L. Ed. 2d 107, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 390
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 21, 1963
Docket326
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 375 U.S. 43 (Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Male) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Male, 375 U.S. 43, 84 S. Ct. 148, 11 L. Ed. 2d 107, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 390 (1963).
Opinion
HUMBLE OIL & REFINING CO. ET AL.
v.
MALE, COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY, NEW JERSEY.
Supreme Court of United States.
T. Girard Wharton and John W. Fritz for appellants.
Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, and Theodore I. Botter, First Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Public Service Electric & Gas Co. v. Rodriguez
478 A.2d 1231 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1984)
State v. Imperatore
223 A.2d 498 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1966)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
375 U.S. 43, 84 S. Ct. 148, 11 L. Ed. 2d 107, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 390, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/humble-oil-refining-co-v-male-scotus-1963.