Humberto Verde v. Nationwide Capital Services, LLC

• Court: District Court, S.D. Texas
• Decided: October 28, 2025
• Docket: 4:25-cv-02608
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

November 03, 2025 Nathan Ochsner, Clerk UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

HUMBERTO VERDE, § CIVIL ACTION NO Plaintiff, § 4:25-cv-02608 § § vs. § JUDGE CHARLES ESKRIDGE § § NATIONWIDE CAPITAL § SERVICES, LLC, § Defendant. § ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff Humberto Verde proceeds here pro se. He filed a request for entry of default against Defendant Nationwide Capital Services, LLC. Dkt 7. Pending is a Memorandum and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge Richard W. Bennett, recommending that the request for entry of default be denied because Plaintiff failed to provide proof of proper service under Rule 4(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Dkt 11. The district court reviews de novo those conclusions of a magistrate judge to which a party has specifically objected. See FRCP 72(b)(3) & 28 USC § 636(b)(1)(C); see also United States v Wilson, 864 F2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir 1989, per curiam). The district court may accept any other portions to which there’s no objection if satisfied that no clear error appears on the face of the record. See Guillory v PPG Industries Inc, 434 F3d 303, 308 (5th Cir 2005), citing Douglass v United Services Automobile Association, 79 F3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir 1996, en banc); see also FRCP 72(b) advisory committee note (1983). None of the parties filed objections. No clear error otherwise appears upon review and consideration of the Memorandum and Recommendation, the record, and the applicable law. The Memorandum and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the Memorandum and Order of this Court. Dkt 11. This request for entry of default is DENIED. Dkt 7. SO ORDERED. Signed on October 28, 2025, at Houston, Texas.

Z. Hon Charles Eskrid United States District Judge