Humberto Leal, Jr. v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 23, 2008
Docket04-08-00818-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Humberto Leal, Jr. v. State (Humberto Leal, Jr. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Humberto Leal, Jr. v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-08-00818-CR

Humberto LEAL, Jr., Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 1994-CR-4696 Honorable Maria Teresa Herr, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Delivered and Filed: December 23, 2008

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

This appeal concerns the denial of appellant’s request for post-conviction DNA testing. See

TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. ANN . arts. 64.01-.05 (Vernon Supp. 2008). Because this court has no

jurisdiction over this appeal, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Appellant was convicted of capital murder and sentenced to death for the slaying of Adria

Sauceda. Appellant subsequently filed a motion for DNA testing pursuant to chapter 64 of the Texas

Code of Criminal Procedure. The trial court denied appellant’s motion, and he brought this appeal. 04-08-00818-CR

Under the plain language of the statute, a person convicted of a capital crime and sentenced

to death must appeal the denial of a request for DNA testing directly to the court of criminal appeals.

Id. art. 64.05 (“An appeal under this chapter is to a court of appeals in the same manner as an appeal

of any other criminal matter, except that if the convicted person was convicted in a capital case and

was sentenced to death, the appeal is a direct appeal to the court of criminal appeals.”). This appeal

therefore should have been filed in the court of criminal appeals. The proper remedy in this case is

to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction and to instruct the Clerk of this court to deliver the

record to the court of criminal appeals for filing.

Based on the foregoing, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

DO NOT PUBLISH

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Humberto Leal, Jr. v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/humberto-leal-jr-v-state-texapp-2008.