Humbel Oil & Refining Company v. Noah S. Cutrer and Nicholas D. Olivier, Noah S. Cutrer and Nicholas D. Olivier v. Humble Oil & Befining Company

309 F.2d 752
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 27, 1962·No. 19807_1·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Finding ourselves in accord with the findings and conclusions of the district court as set forth in its opinion, 1 we affirm its judgment for the reasons which it has assigned.

Affirmed.

1

. Cutrer v. Humble Oil & Refining Company, D.C., 202 F.Supp. 568.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Humbel Oil & Refining Company v. Noah S. Cutrer and Nicholas D. Olivier, Noah S. Cutrer and Nicholas D. Olivier v. Humble Oil & Befining Company, 309 F.2d 752 (5th Cir. 1962).

309 F.2d 752 (Humbel Oil & Refining Company v. Noah S. Cutrer and Nicholas D. Olivier, Noah S. Cutrer and Nicholas D. Olivier v. Humble Oil & Befining Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Goodrich v. Exxon Corp.
642 F. Supp. 150 (W.D. Louisiana, 1986)
Cutrer v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.
228 F. Supp. 787 (E.D. Louisiana, 1964)