Hults v. State

327 So. 2d 210
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedFebruary 11, 1976
DocketNo. 47054
StatusPublished

This text of 327 So. 2d 210 (Hults v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hults v. State, 327 So. 2d 210 (Fla. 1976).

Opinion

OVERTON, Justice.

This cause is before us on a petition for writ of certiorari to review a decision of the Second District Court of Appeal reported at 307 So.2d 489 (Fla.App.2nd, 1975). That decision held illegal a sentence placing petitioner on probation after completion of a prison term where the probationary period did not fall within a stayed period of imprisonment. As such, it conflicts with our recent decision in State v. Jones, 327 So.2d 18 (Fla.1976) ,1

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. We dispense with oral argument and the filing of briefs on the merits. The decision of the District Court is quashed, and the cause is remanded with instructions to reinstate the split sentence probation imposed by the trial judge. State v. Jones, supra.

It is so ordered.

ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS and ENGLAND, JJ., concur. BOYD, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hults v. State
307 So. 2d 489 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)
State v. Jones
327 So. 2d 18 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
327 So. 2d 210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hults-v-state-fla-1976.