Hulst v. Maresca

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hulst v. Maresca

238 A.D. 862

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1933

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 238 A.D. 862 (Hulst v. Maresca) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hulst v. Maresca, 238 A.D. 862 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Order denying motion to vacate the referee’s report of sale reversed on the law and motion granted, without costs. Under the provisions of section 1019-a of the Greater New York Charter, the balance of the assessment in question consisting of installments not due at the time of the sale was not then a lien upon the property and the allowance thereof by the referee was improper. Appeal from order denying motion for reargument dismissed, without costs. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying motion to vacate the referee’s report of sale reversed on the law and motion granted, without costs. Under the provisions of section 1019-a of the Greater New York Charter, the balance of the assessment in question consisting of installments not due at the time of the sale was not then a lien upon the property and the allowance thereof by the referee was improper. Appeal from order denying motion for reargument dismissed, without costs. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

238 A.D. 862, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hulst-v-maresca-nyappdiv-1933.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack