Hulshart v. Hart

1 N.J.L. 62

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided April 15, 1791·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant ought not to lose the benefit of his witnesses on bare allegation of interest; it must be proved by witnesses, or on their voir dire.

Reverse the judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hulshart v. Hart, 1 N.J.L. 62 (N.J. 1791).

Pincite

1 N.J.L. 62 (Hulshart v. Hart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.