Hulsey v. State
This text of 1967 OK CR 82 (Hulsey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an original proceeding filed by the petitioner, Veirl Hulsey, for a writ of habeas corpus, alleging that his sentence-is excessive and greater than permitted by law.
This Court finds the identical allegation was made by petitioner in the appeal of his conviction (Okl.Cr. 307 P.2d 553) and this Court stated:
“In view of the fact that the sentence imposed is only two years in excess of the minimum and five prior convictions-are conclusively shown, we can find no-merit in this contention.”
Further, the Court of Criminal Appeals will: not grant habeas corpus relief where questions raised were in existence and were-properly considered and passed on in accused’s appeal on which his judgment of conviction was affirmed.
For these reasons, the application for-writ of habeas corpus is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1967 OK CR 82, 428 P.2d 351, 1967 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 289, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hulsey-v-state-oklacrimapp-1967.