Hulsey v. State
74 S.E. 1099, 11 Ga. App. 258, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 358
Opinions
1. There was sufficient evidence to authorize the jury to find that the accused wag -absent from the State after the commission of the offense, so as to prevent the statute of limitations from running against the State.
2. As to the charge of the court on the statute of limitations, this case is controlled by the decision of this court in the case of Cohen v. State, 2 Ga. App. 689 (59 S. E. 4). Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hulsey v. State, 74 S.E. 1099, 11 Ga. App. 258, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 358 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).
74 S.E. 1099 (Hulsey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McLane v. State
4 Ga. 335 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1848)
Cohen v. State
59 S.E. 4 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1907)