Hulsey v. Smith

156 S.E.2d 353, 223 Ga. 522, 1967 Ga. LEXIS 594
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 14, 1967·No. 24190·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Almand, Presiding Justice.

The sole enumeration of error is that the court on the presentation of a petition by the appellees issued a rule nisi ordering the appellant to show cause why a temporary injunction should not be granted, and it granted a temporary restraining order ex parte. The appellees have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal as being premature. Held:

Motion to dismiss is granted. Sec. 1 (a) of the Appellate Practice Act of 1965 (Ga. L. 1965, p. 18; Code Ann. § 6-701) provides appeals may be taken “1. [w]here the judgment is final — that is to say- — -where the cause is no longer pending in the court below” and “3. . . . from all judgments or orders rendered after hearing, continuing in effect ... or refusing to continue ... a temporary restraining order.” The present appeal is not from a final judgment nor was the judgment an interlocutory injunction granted after a hearing.

Appeal dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hulsey v. Smith, 156 S.E.2d 353, 223 Ga. 522, 1967 Ga. LEXIS 594 (Ga. 1967).

156 S.E.2d 353 (Hulsey v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Krystal D. Ruemker A/K/A Krystal D. Stanley v. Raymond Ruemker
792 S.E.2d 727 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2016)
Williams v. Ware
242 S.E.2d 108 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1978)
Clements v. Kushinka
210 S.E.2d 804 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1974)
George v. George
201 S.E.2d 418 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1973)
Russell v. Russell Transfer Co.
186 S.E.2d 101 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1971)
Akins v. Tucker
181 S.E.2d 366 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1971)