Hulsey v. Cedartown Textiles Inc.

68 S.E.2d 709, 208 Ga. 666
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 14, 1952
DocketNo. 17664
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 68 S.E.2d 709 (Hulsey v. Cedartown Textiles Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hulsey v. Cedartown Textiles Inc., 68 S.E.2d 709, 208 Ga. 666 (Ga. 1952).

Opinion

Wyatt, Justice.

1. It is contended by the plaintiff in error that the judgment of the court below was illegal because the defendants were exercising their constitutionally protected rights of freedom of speech and freedom of assembly under the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of Georgia of 1945. Such an assignment of error is too indefinite to raise any question for decision by • this court.

2. All other questions raised in the instant case are controlled by the rulings made in the case of Williams v. Cedartown Textiles, ante.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Garland v. State of Georgia
114 S.E.2d 176 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
68 S.E.2d 709, 208 Ga. 666, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hulsey-v-cedartown-textiles-inc-ga-1952.