Hulse v. White

1 N.J.L. 201
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 15, 1793·Published

Opinion

Per Cur.

The question is not proper. The defendant, cannot avail himself of the use made by plaintiffs of the property of another in order to lessen the damages. We must suppose that the real owner will have satisfaction for the profits received from his land.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hulse v. White, 1 N.J.L. 201 (N.J. 1793).

1 N.J.L. 201 (Hulse v. White) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.