Hulse v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Hulse v. State

1917 OK CR 63, 164 P. 989, 13 Okla. Crim. 245, 1917 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 97

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMarch 27, 1917

DocketNo. A-2703.

StatusPublished

This text of 1917 OK CR 63 (Hulse v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hulse v. State, 1917 OK CR 63, 164 P. 989, 13 Okla. Crim. 245, 1917 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 97 (Okla. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted ' apun a charge of having sold whisky to oné Tom White-shirt, <and his punishment fixed at three months’ imprisonment in the county jail and a fine of $400. From the judgment rendered in pursuance bf the verdict he appealed, by. filing in this court on April 8, 1916, a petition in error with case-made.

No- brief has been filed, and on the call, of the case for final submission the Attorney General moved that the judgment be affirmed for failure to prosecute the appeal.

*246 An examination of the record discloses that the • evidence is ample to support the verdict, and, no'error appearing that could affect the merits of the case, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted ' apun a charge of having sold whisky to oné Tom White-shirt, <and his punishment fixed at three months’ imprisonment in the county jail and a fine of $400. From the judgment rendered in pursuance bf the verdict he appealed, by. filing in this court on April 8, 1916, a petition in error with case-made.

No- brief has been filed, and on the call, of the case for final submission the Attorney General moved that the judgment be affirmed for failure to prosecute the appeal.

*246 An examination of the record discloses that the • evidence is ample to support the verdict, and, no'error appearing that could affect the merits of the case, the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1917 OK CR 63, 164 P. 989, 13 Okla. Crim. 245, 1917 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 97, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hulse-v-state-oklacrimapp-1917.