Hulse v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Hulse v. State

1917 OK CR 63, 164 P. 989, 13 Okla. Crim. 245, 1917 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 97

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided March 27, 1917·No. No. A-2703.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted ' apun a charge of having sold whisky to oné Tom White-shirt, <and his punishment fixed at three months’ imprisonment in the county jail and a fine of $400. From the judgment rendered in pursuance bf the verdict he appealed, by. filing in this court on April 8, 1916, a petition in error with case-made.

No- brief has been filed, and on the call, of the case for final submission the Attorney General moved that the judgment be affirmed for failure to prosecute the appeal.

*246 An examination of the record discloses that the • evidence is ample to support the verdict, and, no'error appearing that could affect the merits of the case, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted ' apun a charge of having sold whisky to oné Tom White-shirt, <and his punishment fixed at three months’ imprisonment in the county jail and a fine of $400. From the judgment rendered in pursuance bf the verdict he appealed, by. filing in this court on April 8, 1916, a petition in error with case-made.

No- brief has been filed, and on the call, of the case for final submission the Attorney General moved that the judgment be affirmed for failure to prosecute the appeal.

*246 An examination of the record discloses that the • evidence is ample to support the verdict, and, no'error appearing that could affect the merits of the case, the judgment is affirmed.

Hulse v. State, 1917 OK CR 63, 164 P. 989, 13 Okla. Crim. 245, 1917 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 97 (Okla. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

1917 OK CR 63 (Hulse v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.