Hulse v. Starke

Supreme Court of Georgia

Hulse v. Starke

110 S.E. 275, 152 Ga. 496, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 203

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 12, 1922

DocketNo. 2404

StatusPublished

This text of 110 S.E. 275 (Hulse v. Starke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hulse v. Starke, 110 S.E. 275, 152 Ga. 496, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 203 (Ga. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

1. This is an action at law on a contract, to recover an amount alleged to be due by the defendant upon demands based on performance of the contract by plaintiffs. The Court of Appeals, and no-t the Supreme Court, has jurisdiction. The prayer that the defendant be required to produce certain documents on the trial does not convert the c'ase into an equitable action.

'2. The ease, being of the character indicated in the preceding note, will [497]*497be transferred to the Court of Appeals for decision. See Burress v. Montgomery, 148 Ga. 548 (97 S. E. 538).

No. 2404. January 12, 1922.

Writ of error; from Bichmond superior court.

Isaac S. Peebles Jr., for plaintiffs in error. C. II. & B. 8. Cohen, contra.

Transferred to Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI