Hulse Import Co. v. United States

49 Cust. Ct. 208, 1962 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1132
United States Customs Court·Decided August 13, 1962·No. No. 66985; protests 225123-K, etc., and protests 58/18398, etc., respectively·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

Plaintiffs’ application for rehearing dismissed, with 'accompanying memorandum, by order of Judge Richardson and Judge Johnson. Judge Donlon specially concurred. The following memoranda accompanied the order:

Memorandum:

Richardson, Judge :

Plaintiffs have made a motion for a rehearing in these consolidated protest proceedings. The decision and judgment to which this motion is addressed were entered herein on May 7, 1962, C.D. 2338. Examination of the file discloses the fact that the moving papers were filed with the clerk of the Customs Court on June 7, 1962. The motion for rehearing is governed by 28 U.S.C.A., section 2640, and rule 6(a) of the Customs Court rules which require, among other things, the filing of the motion papers within 30 days of the entry of judgment. On the facts of record, this statutory period expired herein on June 6, 1962. Therefore, the filing of the motion for rehearing is untimely and preempts determination of its merits, in consequence of which, the motion must be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hulse Import Co. v. United States, 49 Cust. Ct. 208, 1962 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1132 (cusc 1962).

49 Cust. Ct. 208 (Hulse Import Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Minkap of California, Inc. v. United States
55 C.C.P.A. 1 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1967)