Hulse Import Co. v. United States

33 Cust. Ct. 409, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 871
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hulse Import Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 29 Cust. Ct. 504
United States Customs Court·Decided November 4, 1954·No. No. 58472; petition 6955-R (San Francisco)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

From the testimony, it appeared that at the time of the entry of the merchandise the matter of the correct basis of value was under discussion between the customhouse broker and the appraiser. Entry was made at the higher value, which the appraiser indicated he was prepared to adopt. Subsequently, upon consultation between the head of the petitioning company, the customhouse broker, and the attorneys, it was decided to litigate the issue, and a timely amendment of the entry was filed, reducing the entered values. The matter proceeded to trial, and the ultimate decision was against the importer’s contention. On the record presented, it was held that there was no intention to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hulse Import Co. v. United States, 33 Cust. Ct. 409, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 871 (cusc 1954).

33 Cust. Ct. 409 (Hulse Import Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.