Hulme v. Janes
6 Tex. 242
Opinion
The judgment is void as against Burtridge, and as it is indivisible in its nature it is necessarily void as against the other defendants.
The suit should have been discontinued, under the provisions of article 704 of the Digest, and judgment against the others would have been valid. Judgment reversed and cause remanded for further proceedings.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hulme v. Janes, 6 Tex. 242 (Tex. 1851).
6 Tex. 242 (Hulme v. Janes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hendricks v. City of Sherman
220 S.W.2d 189 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1949)
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Richey
18 S.W.2d 231 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1929)
Hume v. Schintz
40 S.W. 1067 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1897)
Watson Newell v. Steinau Bros.
33 A. 4 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1895)
Roller v. Ried
26 S.W. 1060 (Texas Supreme Court, 1894)
Wootters v. Kauffman
3 S.W. 465 (Texas Supreme Court, 1887)
Linn v. Arambould
55 Tex. 611 (Texas Supreme Court, 1881)
Long & Berry v. Garnett
45 Tex. 400 (Texas Supreme Court, 1876)