Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Hulme v. Donnelly

Hulme v. Donnelly

112 A. 498, 95 N.J.L. 545, 1921 N.J. LEXIS 148
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedFebruary 28, 1921
StatusPublished

This text of 112 A. 498 (Hulme v. Donnelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hulme v. Donnelly, 112 A. 498, 95 N.J.L. 545, 1921 N.J. LEXIS 148 (N.J. 1921).

Opinion

Per Cueiajvl

The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Swayze in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The ChaNCedloR, Chief Justioe, TREXCirARD, PARKER, BERGEN, MlNTÜRN, KaDISCIÍ, KaT-zeNBACU, White, HeppüNTIeimer, WilliaMS, Taylor, GARDNER, AOKBRSON, JJ. 14. For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
112 A. 498, 95 N.J.L. 545, 1921 N.J. LEXIS 148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hulme-v-donnelly-nj-1921.