Hull v. State

120 S.E. 38, 31 Ga. App. 108, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 754
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 13, 1923
Docket14766
StatusPublished

This text of 120 S.E. 38 (Hull v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hull v. State, 120 S.E. 38, 31 Ga. App. 108, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 754 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Opinion

Broyles, O. J.

The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence, and neither of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial shows cause for a reversal of the judgment below.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworih, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
120 S.E. 38, 31 Ga. App. 108, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 754, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hull-v-state-gactapp-1923.