Hull v. State

708 So. 2d 692, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 4351, 1998 WL 199708
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 24, 1998·No. No. 98-713·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(f). See also Penn v. State, 688 So.2d 450 (Fla. [693]*6935th DCA 1997); O’Brien v. State, 689 So.2d 336 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. denied, 697 So.2d 511 (Fla.1997); Bradley v. State, 703 So.2d 1176 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997).

GRIFFIN, C.J., and DAUKSC.H and W. SHARP, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hull v. State, 708 So. 2d 692, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 4351, 1998 WL 199708 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

708 So. 2d 692 (Hull v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ayo v. State
708 So. 2d 692 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)