Hull v. Schake

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hull v. Schake

256 A.D. 888, 9 N.Y.S.2d 55, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5246

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 5, 1939·Published

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: We conclude that the jury’s determination which found no actionable negligence by the defendant, was in accord with the weight of evidence and that the plaintiff’s rights were not prejudiced by any ruling of the trial court. All concur. (The judgment is for defendant in an automobile negligence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: We conclude that the jury’s determination which found no actionable negligence by the defendant, was in accord with the weight of evidence and that the plaintiff’s rights were not prejudiced by any ruling of the trial court. All concur. (The judgment is for defendant in an automobile negligence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham and Taylor, JJ.

Hull v. Schake, 256 A.D. 888, 9 N.Y.S.2d 55, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5246 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

256 A.D. 888 (Hull v. Schake) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.