Hull v. Joesbury
1 How. Pr. 192
This text of 1 How. Pr. 192 (Hull v. Joesbury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hull v. Joesbury, 1 How. Pr. 192 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1845).
Opinion
The defendant moved on the ground that the declaration must conform to the capias. That one defendant only could not be declared against in tort, where the capias was returned personally served on him, and a return of non est inventus as to the other.
Thought differently—and denied the motion, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 How. Pr. 192, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hull-v-joesbury-nysupct-1845.