Hull v. Florida Agency for Persons with Disabilities

91 So. 3d 278, 2012 WL 2874245
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 16, 2012
DocketNo. 1D12-0253
StatusPublished

This text of 91 So. 3d 278 (Hull v. Florida Agency for Persons with Disabilities) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hull v. Florida Agency for Persons with Disabilities, 91 So. 3d 278, 2012 WL 2874245 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellee’s motion to remand is treated by the court as a concession of error. In accordance therewith, the final order on appeal is reversed, and the matter is remanded to the lower tribunal for further proceedings consistent with Newsome v. Agency for Persons with Disabilities, 76 So.3d 972 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).

PADOVANO, ROWE, and RAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Newsome v. Agency for Persons with Disabilities
76 So. 3d 972 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
91 So. 3d 278, 2012 WL 2874245, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hull-v-florida-agency-for-persons-with-disabilities-fladistctapp-2012.