Hull v. Florida Agency for Persons with Disabilities

91 So. 3d 278, 2012 WL 2874245
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 16, 2012·No. No. 1D12-0253·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellee’s motion to remand is treated by the court as a concession of error. In accordance therewith, the final order on appeal is reversed, and the matter is remanded to the lower tribunal for further proceedings consistent with Newsome v. Agency for Persons with Disabilities, 76 So.3d 972 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).

PADOVANO, ROWE, and RAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hull v. Florida Agency for Persons with Disabilities, 91 So. 3d 278, 2012 WL 2874245 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

91 So. 3d 278 (Hull v. Florida Agency for Persons with Disabilities) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Newsome v. Agency for Persons with Disabilities
76 So. 3d 972 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)