Hull v. Florida Agency for Persons with Disabilities
91 So. 3d 278, 2012 WL 2874245
Opinion
Appellee’s motion to remand is treated by the court as a concession of error. In accordance therewith, the final order on appeal is reversed, and the matter is remanded to the lower tribunal for further proceedings consistent with Newsome v. Agency for Persons with Disabilities, 76 So.3d 972 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hull v. Florida Agency for Persons with Disabilities, 91 So. 3d 278, 2012 WL 2874245 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).
91 So. 3d 278 (Hull v. Florida Agency for Persons with Disabilities) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Newsome v. Agency for Persons with Disabilities
76 So. 3d 972 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)