Hull v. Dicks

Fifth Circuit

Hull v. Dicks

220 F. 1006, 135 C.C.A. 665, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2551

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 22, 1915

DocketNo. 2398

StatusPublished

This text of 220 F. 1006 (Hull v. Dicks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hull v. Dicks, 220 F. 1006, 135 C.C.A. 665, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2551 (5th Cir. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The following question, to wit: “Where a resident citizen of Georgia has been duly adjudicated a bankrupt and dies after such adjudication and after the appointment, qualification and partial administration of the trustee, is the estate vested in the trustee under section 70 of the Bankruptcy Law of 1898 (Act July 1, 1898, c. 541, 30 Stat, 565 [Comp. St. 1913, § 9654]), chargeable under section 8 of the same law, or. otherwise, with the allowance for a year’s support of the widow and minor children, as provided in the laws of Georgia ?’’^ — having been, certified to the Supreme Court, and having-been answered in the affirmative (235 U. S. 584, 35 Sup. Ct, 152, 59 L. Ed. —), and, the same being decisive, of this ease, the petition for revision is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The following question, to wit: “Where a resident citizen of Georgia has been duly adjudicated a bankrupt and dies after such adjudication and after the appointment, qualification and partial administration of the trustee, is the estate vested in the trustee under section 70 of the Bankruptcy Law of 1898 (Act July 1, 1898, c. 541, 30 Stat, 565 [Comp. St. 1913, § 9654]), chargeable under section 8 of the same law, or. otherwise, with the allowance for a year’s support of the widow and minor children, as provided in the laws of Georgia ?’’^ — having been, certified to the Supreme Court, and having-been answered in the affirmative (235 U. S. 584, 35 Sup. Ct, 152, 59 L. Ed. —), and, the same being decisive, of this ease, the petition for revision is denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

220 F. 1006, 135 C.C.A. 665, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2551, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hull-v-dicks-ca5-1915.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack