Hull v. Baltimore City Community College

Fourth Circuit

Hull v. Baltimore City Community College

207 F. App'x 331

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 28, 2006·No. No. 06-1874·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Adonica Q. Hull appeals the district court’s order dismissing as untimely filed her employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hull v. Baltimore City Cmty. Coll., No. 1:06-ev-01439-WDQ (D.Md. July 5, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Adonica Q. Hull appeals the district court’s order dismissing as untimely filed her employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hull v. Baltimore City Cmty. Coll., No. 1:06-ev-01439-WDQ (D.Md. July 5, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Hull v. Baltimore City Community College, 207 F. App'x 331 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

207 F. App'x 331 (Hull v. Baltimore City Community College) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.