Hulings v. Lewis
16 A. 24, 2 Monag. 422, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 820
Opinion
The learned judge of the court below ruled correctly that the Mead warrant embraced the island in controversy, and properly directed á verdict for the defendant.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hulings v. Lewis, 16 A. 24, 2 Monag. 422, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 820 (Pa. 1888).
16 A. 24 (Hulings v. Lewis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
George v. Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation
D. Arizona, 2025
N. O. Texas & Mexico Railway Co. v. Lehman, Stern & Co.
3 Pelt. 118 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1920)