Huling v. State

92 So. 2d 50, 265 Ala. 697, 1957 Ala. LEXIS 327
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided January 17, 1957·No. 7 Div. 344·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

STAKELY, Justice.

The Court has decided that the petition for certiorari must be stricken because it was not filed within the time required by law. We would like to add, however, that a careful consideration of the petition for certiorari shows that it is without merit.

Petition for Certiorari stricken.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and LAWSON and MERRILL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Huling v. State, 92 So. 2d 50, 265 Ala. 697, 1957 Ala. LEXIS 327 (Ala. 1957).

92 So. 2d 50 (Huling v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Orum v. State
245 So. 2d 831 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1971)
Hayes v. State
99 So. 2d 703 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1957)