Huling v. State

92 So. 2d 50, 265 Ala. 697, 1957 Ala. LEXIS 327
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJanuary 17, 1957
Docket7 Div. 344
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 92 So. 2d 50 (Huling v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Huling v. State, 92 So. 2d 50, 265 Ala. 697, 1957 Ala. LEXIS 327 (Ala. 1957).

Opinion

STAKELY, Justice.

The Court has decided that the petition for certiorari must be stricken because it was not filed within the time required by law. We would like to add, however, that a careful consideration of the petition for certiorari shows that it is without merit.

Petition for Certiorari stricken.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and LAWSON and MERRILL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Orum v. State
245 So. 2d 831 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1971)
Hayes v. State
99 So. 2d 703 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
92 So. 2d 50, 265 Ala. 697, 1957 Ala. LEXIS 327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huling-v-state-ala-1957.