Huling v. Huling

38 Ill. App. 144, 1890 Ill. App. LEXIS 292
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedSeptember 20, 1890
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 38 Ill. App. 144 (Huling v. Huling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Huling v. Huling, 38 Ill. App. 144, 1890 Ill. App. LEXIS 292 (Ill. Ct. App. 1890).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The single question presented by this record is, whether desertion, set up by way of recrimination, is a good answer to a hill for divorce charging adultery; and although the rulings upon it elsewhere seem to be variant, we think that for this State it is decisively answered in the negative by the case of Bast v. Bast, 82 111. 584.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McNeir v. McNeir
76 Misc. 661 (New York Supreme Court, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
38 Ill. App. 144, 1890 Ill. App. LEXIS 292, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huling-v-huling-illappct-1890.