Huling v. Huling
38 Ill. App. 144, 1890 Ill. App. LEXIS 292
Opinion
The single question presented by this record is, whether desertion, set up by way of recrimination, is a good answer to a hill for divorce charging adultery; and although the rulings upon it elsewhere seem to be variant, we think that for this State it is decisively answered in the negative by the case of Bast v. Bast, 82 111. 584.
Decree affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Huling v. Huling, 38 Ill. App. 144, 1890 Ill. App. LEXIS 292 (Ill. Ct. App. 1890).
38 Ill. App. 144 (Huling v. Huling) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McNeir v. McNeir
76 Misc. 661 (New York Supreme Court, 1911)