Huling v. Hargett

116 S.E. 555, 30 Ga. App. 49, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 241
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 7, 1923
Docket14097
StatusPublished

This text of 116 S.E. 555 (Huling v. Hargett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Huling v. Hargett, 116 S.E. 555, 30 Ga. App. 49, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 241 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and none of the grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial requires a reversal of the judgment below.

Jugment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
116 S.E. 555, 30 Ga. App. 49, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 241, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huling-v-hargett-gactapp-1923.