Hukoveh v. Alston

165 P. 988, 25 Wyo. 122, 1917 Wyo. LEXIS 12
CourtWyoming Supreme Court
DecidedJune 26, 1917
DocketNo. 908
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 165 P. 988 (Hukoveh v. Alston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wyoming Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hukoveh v. Alston, 165 P. 988, 25 Wyo. 122, 1917 Wyo. LEXIS 12 (Wyo. 1917).

Opinion

Potter, Chirp Justice.

This is a habeas corpus proceeding, the plaintiff,' John Hukoveh, alleging that he is illegally restrained of his liberty by imprisonment in the state penitentiary. Upon an information charging him with the crime of robbery, and his plea of guilty, he was sentenced by the District Court in Lincoln County on February 15, 1917, to imprisonment in the state penitentiary for the term of not less than four nor more than six years; and under a mittimus issued out of said court reciting the judgment and directing 'the sheriff to take and deliver the plaintiff to said penitentiary and the warden and other officers thereof, to keep and imprison him therein for the term of said sentence, he was delivered to and received at the penitentiary and is now there confined. The petition alleges these facts, and also that the charge and sentence was for a first offense, and that the plaintiff at the time of the sentence was under the age of twenty-five years, viz.: eighteen years. The facts are not in dispute, but the [126]*126answer denies that the plaintiff’s imprisonment is unlawful.

'The contention on behalf of the plaintiff is that the court was without authority to sentence him to imprisonment in the penitentiary, and that its only authority to sentence him to imprisonment was to require that he be imprisoned in the. Wyoming Industrial .Institute. That contention is based upon Section 540, Compiled Statutes, 1910, and Section -8 of Chapter 63 of the Laws of 1913. Section 540, Compiled Statutes of 1910, is the first section of Chapter 44 of that compilation and was enacted as the first section of Chapter 90 of the Laws of 1909. It reads as follows:

“Any person between the ages of 16 and 25 years, convicted of a felony, who has not theretofore been convicted of a crime punishable by imprisonment in the state penitentiary, may, in the discretion of the trial court, be sentenced to imprisonment in the reformatory of the state, with which the State Board of Charities and Reform of this state may make arrangements for the care, custody and maintenance of such convict, as hereinafter provided, such person to be confined in such reformatory under the provisions of the law relating to that institution, and under the rules and regulations governing the same, to be treated, cared for, kept and confined in such reformatory in the same manner and for the same period of time, not exceeding the maximum term provided by the laws of this state for the offense of which the offender was convicted, as are convicts sentenced to such institution by the courts of the state in which such institution is situate and located. In imposing sentence in all -such cases the courts of this state shall not fix or limit the duration of the period of confinement in such reformatory further than that it shall not in any event exceed the maximum term provided by the laws of this state for the offense of which the prisoner was convicted; Provided, however, That the Governor of this state may upon the recommendation of the superintendent, superior officer or governing body of any such reformatory grant to such convict a parole or discharge from said reformatory in accordance [127]*127with the laws of the state in which the same is situated or. the rules of such institution.”

The title of the original act was: “An Act authorizing the District Court of this state, in sentencing certain persons convicted of felonies, to sentence them to a reform institution of some other state, and authorizing and empowering the State Board of Charities and Reform to make arrangements for the care, custody and maintenance of such persons so sentenced.” The other sections of the Act are included in the same order in Chapter 44 of the Compiled Statutes aforesaid, except the last section of the Act, which declared that it should take effect and be in force from and after July 1, 1909, and they complete the chapter. Those sections provide for the parole and discharge of a person confined in the reformatory; that the Board of Charities and Reform may contract with the authorities of any other state for the care, custody and maintenance of persons sentenced, under the provisions of the chapter, to the reformatory of another state; and authorize the transfer from the penitentiary to said reformatory, on the order of the Governor when recommended by the ¡board, of any person between 16 and 25 years of age thereafter sentenced to imprisonment in the penitentiary for more than one year, if the Governor is satisfied that the public interest and the welfare of the convict will be subserved thereby. Provision had previously been made by statute for committing to a reform institution of another state juvenile delinquents under the age of 16 years, and statutes to that effect had been in force since 1884, though an exception was made where the conviction was for homicide, and originally where the conviction was either for homicide, arson or rape. (Rev. Stat. 1887, Secs. 2332-2336; Laws 1888, Ch. 57; Rev. Stat. 1899, Secs. 4930-4934; Comp. Stat. 1910, Secs. 3127-3131.)' And provision was also made in 1907 for the parole and discharge of juvenile delinquents so committed to an institution of another state. (Comp. Stat. 1910, Secs. 3132-3135.)

Provision having been made by a statute enacted in 1911 for establishing the Wyoming Industrial Institute, and it [128]*128having been located at Worland by a vote of the people, as provided by the Act, another Act was passed in 1913, published as Chapter 63 of the Laws of 1913, making further provisions for that institution, and containing the provision particularly relied on in support of the contention that plaintiff’s sentence and his imprisonment in the penitentiary thereunder is unlawful. That provision is found in Section 8 of the Act, which reads as follows:

“Every offender described in Chapter 44, Wyoming Compiled Statutes, 1910, who shall have been convicted, shall be sentenced to imprisonment in the Wyoming Industrial Institute under the provisions of said chapter, and such other juvenile delinquent as in the discretion of the State Board of Charities and Reform should not be confined elsewhere, shall be confined in said Wyoming Industrial Institute. The term of such imprisonment of any person so convicted and sentenced, shall be terminated by the State Board of Charities and Reform, and (as) authorized by this Act. But such imprisonment shall not exceed the maximum term provided. by law for the crime for which the prisoner is convicted and sentenced.”

It is argued by counsel for plaintiff that the above quoted provision of the 1913 statute for sentencing the offenders mentioned to imprisonment in the Wyoming Industrial Institute is to be construed as requiring that every such offender shall be sentenced to imprisonment only in said institute. But we do not so understand or construe that provision, when read, as it must be, in connection with the former statute to which it refers. On the contrary, we think the correct construction of the provision is, that whenever an offender described in the statute referred to — Chapter 44, Compiled Statutes — is sentenced to imprisonment in a reformatory of the state instead of the penitentiary, that sentence shall be for imprisonment in the Wyoming Industrial Institute. That would be our conclusion if based alone upon the language of the statute, but a consideration of the history and purpose of the legislation and other statutory [129]*129provisions bearing on the question leads inevitably to the same conclusion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Uram v. Roach, Warden
37 P.2d 793 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
165 P. 988, 25 Wyo. 122, 1917 Wyo. LEXIS 12, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hukoveh-v-alston-wyo-1917.