Hui Malama I Na Kupuna O Nei v. Wal-Mart

CourtHawaii Supreme Court
DecidedMay 17, 2010
Docket28477
StatusPublished

This text of Hui Malama I Na Kupuna O Nei v. Wal-Mart (Hui Malama I Na Kupuna O Nei v. Wal-Mart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hui Malama I Na Kupuna O Nei v. Wal-Mart, (haw 2010).

Opinion

bMNWJBRARV

NO. 28477

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAFl

HUI MALAMA I NA KUPUNA O HAWAl‘I NEI, a HawaiT.non-profit corporation, PAULETTE KNANOHIOKALANI KALEIKINI, Petitioners/PlaintiffS-Appellants

VS.

WAL-MART, a Delaware corporation doing business in Hawai‘i,- STATE oF HAWAI‘I,~ __ LAURE THIELEN, in her official cspscity§ as the Director of the Department of Land § and Natural Resources of the State of HawaiUB DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES; STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION DlVISION; PUA AIU, in her official capacity as the AdminiStrator of the State Historic Preservation Division of the Department of Land and Natural ReSources; CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU; DEPARTMENT OF PLANNlNG AND PERMITTING FOR THE CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU; DAVID TANOUE, in his official capacity as the Director of the Department of Planning and Permitting for the City and County of Honolulu, ReSpondentS/Defendants-Appellees

W~"H&N L! A`Y'Hl?i@€

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CIV. NO. 03-1-l1l2) .

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRlT OF CERTIORARI (By: Acoba, J., for the courtW The Application for Writ of Certiorari filed on

April 8, 2010 by Petitioners/PlaintiffS-AppellantS Hui Malama I

1 Considered by: Moon, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy, and

Recktenwald, JJ.

GB""H.J

Na Kupuna 0 HawaiH Nei and Paulette K§anohiokalani Kaleikini is hereby rejected.

d DATED: Honolulu, HawaiTq May 17, 20l0.

FOR THE COURT:

Associate Justice

Alan T. Murakami,

Moses K.N. Haia III, and David Kimo Frankel (Native Hawaiian Leqal Corporation), for petitioners/ plaintiffs-appellants.

C. Michael Heihre, Kelly G. Laporte, Allison Mizuo Lee, and Christopher T. Goodin (Cades Schutte), for respondent/ defendant-appellee Wal-Mart.

Carrie K.S. Okinaga, Corporation Counsel,

Don S. Kitaoka and

Jesse K. Souki, Deputies Corporation”Counsel, City and County of Honolulu,

for respondentS/defendants- appellees City and

County of Honolulu,

` Department of Planning

and Permitting, and David Tanoue.

Isaac Hall for amicus curiae Hui Alanui o Makena.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Hui Malama I Na Kupuna O Nei v. Wal-Mart, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hui-malama-i-na-kupuna-o-nei-v-wal-mart-haw-2010.