Huguley v. Republic Steel Corp.

Alabama Court of Appeals

Huguley v. Republic Steel Corp.

11 So. 2d 169, 30 Ala. App. 652

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 27, 1942

Docket7 Div. 635.

StatusPublished

This text of 11 So. 2d 169 (Huguley v. Republic Steel Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Huguley v. Republic Steel Corp., 11 So. 2d 169, 30 Ala. App. 652 (Ala. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

RICE, Judge.

Mutatis mutandis, all that Mr. Justice, now Chief Justice, Gardner said for our Supreme Court in' the opinion in the case of Jerrell v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. et al., 222 Ala. 687, 134 So. 132, has application here — the situations with reference to bills of exceptions vel non being identical.

Hence, upon the authority of the opinion and decision in that case, the judgment appealed from is affirmed. Code 1940, Tit. 13, § 95.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RICE, Judge.

Mutatis mutandis, all that Mr. Justice, now Chief Justice, Gardner said for our Supreme Court in' the opinion in the case of Jerrell v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. et al., 222 Ala. 687, 134 So. 132, has application here — the situations with reference to bills of exceptions vel non being identical.

Hence, upon the authority of the opinion and decision in that case, the judgment appealed from is affirmed. Code 1940, Tit. 13, § 95.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 So. 2d 169, 30 Ala. App. 652, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huguley-v-republic-steel-corp-alactapp-1942.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack