Huguley v. Holmes
This text of 56 S.E. 298 (Huguley v. Holmes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Where in an action to recover damages for alleged trespass upon agricultural land, the title to which was in dispute, and to enjoin ' the alleged trespasser, it appeared, upon an interlocutory hearing of the application for injunction, that the damages were not irreparable, and the evidence as to the solvency of the defendant was conflicting, the discretion of the trial judge in refusing an injunction will not he controlled, even though the evidence submitted may have shown that the land in dispute was really the property of the plaintiff. McFarland v. Park Woolen Mills, 113 Ga. 1072, 1074; Wiggins v. Middleton, 117 Ga. 162; Woodstock Iron Works v. Leake, 118 Ga. 642; Stonecipher v. Wilson, 120 Ga. 466.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
56 S.E. 298, 127 Ga. 202, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 796, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huguley-v-holmes-ga-1906.