Huguley v. Holmes

56 S.E. 298, 127 Ga. 202, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 796
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedDecember 20, 1906
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 56 S.E. 298 (Huguley v. Holmes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Huguley v. Holmes, 56 S.E. 298, 127 Ga. 202, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 796 (Ga. 1906).

Opinion

Fish, C. J.

Where in an action to recover damages for alleged trespass upon agricultural land, the title to which was in dispute, and to enjoin ' the alleged trespasser, it appeared, upon an interlocutory hearing of the application for injunction, that the damages were not irreparable, and the evidence as to the solvency of the defendant was conflicting, the discretion of the trial judge in refusing an injunction will not he controlled, even though the evidence submitted may have shown that the land in dispute was really the property of the plaintiff. McFarland v. Park Woolen Mills, 113 Ga. 1072, 1074; Wiggins v. Middleton, 117 Ga. 162; Woodstock Iron Works v. Leake, 118 Ga. 642; Stonecipher v. Wilson, 120 Ga. 466.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shockley v. Garner
85 S.E.2d 412 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
56 S.E. 298, 127 Ga. 202, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 796, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huguley-v-holmes-ga-1906.