Hugo v. McConnell

Indiana Supreme Court

Hugo v. McConnell

43 Ind. 380

DecidedNovember 15, 1873

StatusPublished

This text of 43 Ind. 380 (Hugo v. McConnell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hugo v. McConnell, 43 Ind. 380 (Ind. 1873).

Pincite

Opinion

Pettit, J.

This suit was brought by John McConnell and William A. Soule, against William H. Hugo and John R. Hugo. All parties stayed in the case until the end of it; and final judgment was rendered against both the Hugos, defendants below. But one of them asked, or has taken, an appeal to this court and assigned errors. No action has been taken under section 551, 2 G. & H. 270; and under the uniform ruling of this court, the appeal must be dismissed.

The appeal is dismissed, at the costs of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pettit, J.

This suit was brought by John McConnell and William A. Soule, against William H. Hugo and John R. Hugo. All parties stayed in the case until the end of it; and final judgment was rendered against both the Hugos, defendants below. But one of them asked, or has taken, an appeal to this court and assigned errors. No action has been taken under section 551, 2 G. & H. 270; and under the uniform ruling of this court, the appeal must be dismissed.

The appeal is dismissed, at the costs of the appellant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

43 Ind. 380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hugo-v-mcconnell-ind-1873.