Hugo & Smetzer v. Dignowitty

Court of Appeals of Texas

Hugo & Smetzer v. Dignowitty

1 White & W. 63

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedMarch 19, 1881

DocketNo. 1229, Op. Book No. 3, p. 509

StatusPublished

This text of 1 White & W. 63 (Hugo & Smetzer v. Dignowitty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hugo & Smetzer v. Dignowitty, 1 White & W. 63 (Tex. Ct. App. 1881).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 158. Injunction; returnable to what county. Writs of injunction to stay proceedings in a suit or execution on a judgment shall be returnable to and tried in the court where the suit is pending or the judgment was rendered. [Pas. Dig. art. 3932; E. S. 2880.] This statute is imperative. [Hendrick v. Cannon, 2 Tex. 259; Winnie v. Greyson, 3 Tex. 429; Cook v. Baldridge & Co. 39 Tex. 250; George v. Dyer and wife, post, p. 000.]

Eeversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 158. Injunction; returnable to what county. Writs of injunction to stay proceedings in a suit or execution on a judgment shall be returnable to and tried in the court where the suit is pending or the judgment was rendered. [Pas. Dig. art. 3932; E. S. 2880.] This statute is imperative. [Hendrick v. Cannon, 2 Tex. 259; Winnie v. Greyson, 3 Tex. 429; Cook v. Baldridge & Co. 39 Tex. 250; George v. Dyer and wife, post, p. 000.]

Eeversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 White & W. 63, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hugo-smetzer-v-dignowitty-texapp-1881.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack