Hugo & Smetzer v. Dignowitty

Court of Appeals of Texas

Hugo & Smetzer v. Dignowitty

1 White & W. 63

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 19, 1881·No. No. 1229, Op. Book No. 3, p. 509·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 158. Injunction; returnable to what county. Writs of injunction to stay proceedings in a suit or execution on a judgment shall be returnable to and tried in the court where the suit is pending or the judgment was rendered. [Pas. Dig. art. 3932; E. S. 2880.] This statute is imperative. [Hendrick v. Cannon, 2 Tex. 259; Winnie v. Greyson, 3 Tex. 429; Cook v. Baldridge & Co. 39 Tex. 250; George v. Dyer and wife, post, p. 000.]

Eeversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 158. Injunction; returnable to what county. Writs of injunction to stay proceedings in a suit or execution on a judgment shall be returnable to and tried in the court where the suit is pending or the judgment was rendered. [Pas. Dig. art. 3932; E. S. 2880.] This statute is imperative. [Hendrick v. Cannon, 2 Tex. 259; Winnie v. Greyson, 3 Tex. 429; Cook v. Baldridge & Co. 39 Tex. 250; George v. Dyer and wife, post, p. 000.]

Eeversed and remanded.

Hugo & Smetzer v. Dignowitty, 1 White & W. 63 (Tex. Ct. App. 1881).

Pincite

1 White & W. 63 (Hugo & Smetzer v. Dignowitty) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related