Hugo Miranda v. State of Florida

181 So. 3d 1188, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 4, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 64, 2016 WL 164159
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided January 14, 2016·No. SC14-888·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted jurisdiction to review the decision of the Third District Court of Appeal in State v. Miranda, 137 *1189 So.3d 1133 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014), based on express and direct conflict. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. After further consideration, we conclude that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby discharge jurisdiction and dismiss this review proceeding.

It is so ordered.

NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED.

LABARGA, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, POLSTON, and PERRY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hugo Miranda v. State of Florida, 181 So. 3d 1188, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 4, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 64, 2016 WL 164159 (Fla. 2016).

181 So. 3d 1188 (Hugo Miranda v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.