Hugley v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Hugley v. State

731 So. 2d 634, 1999 Ala. LEXIS 70, 1999 WL 130252

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedMarch 12, 1999

Docket1980460

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 731 So. 2d 634 (Hugley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hugley v. State, 731 So. 2d 634, 1999 Ala. LEXIS 70, 1999 WL 130252 (Ala. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

HOUSTON, Justice.

The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the trial court’s judgment by an unpublished memorandum. We recognize that such memoranda have very limited prece-dential value, see Rule 54(d), Ala.R.App.P. However, in denying certiorari review, we do not wish to be understood as agreeing with all the language, reasons, or statements of law expressed in that unpublished memorandum.

WRIT DENIED.

HOOPER, C.J., and MADDOX, KENNEDY, COOK, SEE, LYONS, and JOHNSTONE, JJ., concur. BROWN, J., recuses herself.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HOUSTON, Justice.

The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the trial court’s judgment by an unpublished memorandum. We recognize that such memoranda have very limited prece-dential value, see Rule 54(d), Ala.R.App.P. However, in denying certiorari review, we do not wish to be understood as agreeing with all the language, reasons, or statements of law expressed in that unpublished memorandum.

WRIT DENIED.

HOOPER, C.J., and MADDOX, KENNEDY, COOK, SEE, LYONS, and JOHNSTONE, JJ., concur. BROWN, J., recuses herself.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

731 So. 2d 634, 1999 Ala. LEXIS 70, 1999 WL 130252, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hugley-v-state-ala-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack