Hughs v. Unadilla Valley Railway Company
184 N.E. 149, 260 N.Y. 694, 1932 N.Y. LEXIS 884
This text of 184 N.E. 149 (Hughs v. Unadilla Valley Railway Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hughs v. Unadilla Valley Railway Company, 184 N.E. 149, 260 N.Y. 694, 1932 N.Y. LEXIS 884 (N.Y. 1932).
Opinion
Judgment in each action affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Pound, Ch. J., Crane, Lehman, Hubbs and Crouch, JJ. Kellogg and O’Brien, JJ., dissent as to the railway company on the ground there is no evidence of the negligence of the railway company.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
184 N.E. 149, 260 N.Y. 694, 1932 N.Y. LEXIS 884, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hughs-v-unadilla-valley-railway-company-ny-1932.