Hughs v. Unadilla Valley Railway Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hughs v. Unadilla Valley Railway Co.

235 A.D. 751

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1932·Published

Opinion

Judgments affirmed, with costs in one action. (Noakes v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 121 App. Div. 716; affd., 195 N. Y. 543; Nelson v. Nygren, 233 App. Div. 573; Terwilliger v. Long Island R. R. Co., 152 id. 168; affd., 209 N. Y. 522; Hardin v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co., 205 App. Div. 157; Clark v. Traver, Id. 206; Wilhelm v. Lehigh Valley R. R. Co., 215 id. 28, 31.) All concur, except Hinman and Hill, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal and dismissal of the complaints against all defendants on the ground that plaintiffs were guilty of contributory negligence as matter of law. (Read v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 123 App. Div. 228; 165 id. 910: 219 N. Y. 660; 35 Harvard Law Review, 113, 121.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgments affirmed, with costs in one action. (Noakes v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 121 App. Div. 716; affd., 195 N. Y. 543; Nelson v. Nygren, 233 App. Div. 573; Terwilliger v. Long Island R. R. Co., 152 id. 168; affd., 209 N. Y. 522; Hardin v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co., 205 App. Div. 157; Clark v. Traver, Id. 206; Wilhelm v. Lehigh Valley R. R. Co., 215 id. 28, 31.) All concur, except Hinman and Hill, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal and dismissal of the complaints against all defendants on the ground that plaintiffs were guilty of contributory negligence as matter of law. (Read v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 123 App. Div. 228; 165 id. 910: 219 N. Y. 660; 35 Harvard Law Review, 113, 121.)

Hughs v. Unadilla Valley Railway Co., 235 A.D. 751 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

235 A.D. 751 (Hughs v. Unadilla Valley Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related