Hughs v. Unadilla Valley Railway Co.
This text of 235 A.D. 751 (Hughs v. Unadilla Valley Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgments affirmed, with costs in one action. (Noakes v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 121 App. Div. 716; affd., 195 N. Y. 543; Nelson v. Nygren, 233 App. Div. 573; Terwilliger v. Long Island R. R. Co., 152 id. 168; affd., 209 N. Y. 522; Hardin v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co., 205 App. Div. 157; Clark v. Traver, Id. 206; Wilhelm v. Lehigh Valley R. R. Co., 215 id. 28, 31.) All concur, except Hinman and Hill, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal and dismissal of the complaints against all defendants on the ground that plaintiffs were guilty of contributory negligence as matter of law. (Read v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 123 App. Div. 228; 165 id. 910: 219 N. Y. 660; 35 Harvard Law Review, 113, 121.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
235 A.D. 751, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hughs-v-unadilla-valley-railway-co-nyappdiv-1932.