Hughley v. Basham

Fourth Circuit

Hughley v. Basham

91 F. App'x 273

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 23, 2004·No. No. 03-7315·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Mario N. Hughley appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. [274] § 1983 (2000) complaint pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), as barred by the statute of limitations. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and joint appendix and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hughley v. Basham, No. CA-03-85-2 (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 1, 2003 & entered Aug. 4, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Mario N. Hughley appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. [274] § 1983 (2000) complaint pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), as barred by the statute of limitations. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and joint appendix and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hughley v. Basham, No. CA-03-85-2 (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 1, 2003 & entered Aug. 4, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Hughley v. Basham, 91 F. App'x 273 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

91 F. App'x 273 (Hughley v. Basham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.