Hughes's Administrators v. Stokes's Administrators

2 N.C. 427
Superior Court of North Carolina·Decided September 15, 1796·Published

Opinion

Per curiam

The wife in the present case, acted as the agí nt or servant of the husband, and received his monies. The business was carried on by her, and her declarations should be admitted to discharge^Stokes. upon the same principle it was admitted in the case cited from Strimge. The evidence was received;

Note. — Vide Emmerson v. Blonden, 1 Esp. Reports 142. Fenner v. Lewis, 10 Johns. Rep. 38, cited in 2d Am. Edit. 2d Vol. Phil. on Evid. 221.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hughes's Administrators v. Stokes's Administrators, 2 N.C. 427 (N.C. Ct. App. 1796).

2 N.C. 427 (Hughes's Administrators v. Stokes's Administrators) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.