Hughes's Administrators v. Stokes's Administrators

Superior Court of North Carolina

Hughes's Administrators v. Stokes's Administrators

2 N.C. 427

DecidedSeptember 15, 1796

StatusPublished

This text of 2 N.C. 427 (Hughes's Administrators v. Stokes's Administrators) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hughes's Administrators v. Stokes's Administrators, 2 N.C. 427 (N.C. Ct. App. 1796).

Pincite

Opinion

Per curiam

The wife in the present case, acted as the agí nt or servant of the husband, and received his monies. The business was carried on by her, and her declarations should be admitted to discharge^Stokes. upon the same principle it was admitted in the case cited from Strimge. The evidence was received;

Note. — Vide Emmerson v. Blonden, 1 Esp. Reports 142. Fenner v. Lewis, 10 Johns. Rep. 38, cited in 2d Am. Edit. 2d Vol. Phil. on Evid. 221.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam

The wife in the present case, acted as the agí nt or servant of the husband, and received his monies. The business was carried on by her, and her declarations should be admitted to discharge^Stokes. upon the same principle it was admitted in the case cited from Strimge. The evidence was received;

Note. — Vide Emmerson v. Blonden, 1 Esp. Reports 142. Fenner v. Lewis, 10 Johns. Rep. 38, cited in 2d Am. Edit. 2d Vol. Phil. on Evid. 221.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 N.C. 427, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hughess-administrators-v-stokess-administrators-ncsuperct-1796.