Hughes v. Wood
759 N.W.2d 883
This text of 759 N.W.2d 883 (Hughes v. Wood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hughes v. Wood, 759 N.W.2d 883 (Mich. 2009).
Opinion
Deborah A. HUGHES, Plaintiff/Counter-Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Ronald A. WOOD, Walter Roe, Donald Williams, County of Antrim, and Arlen Turner, Defendants-Appellees, and
Cecil P. Dunn and Robert Dunn, Defendants-Appellees, and
Diane Dunn, Defendant, and
Cecil P. Dunn Construction, Inc., Defendant/Counter-Defendant-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
*884 Order
On order of the Court, the motion for miscellaneous relief is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the March 11, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MARILYN J. KELLY, C.J., and MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH, J., would grant leave to appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
759 N.W.2d 883, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hughes-v-wood-mich-2009.