Hughes v. Wilkerson

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hughes v. Wilkerson

49 So. 3d 869, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 19836, 2010 WL 5347527

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 29, 2010

DocketNo. 4D10-1685

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 49 So. 3d 869 (Hughes v. Wilkerson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hughes v. Wilkerson, 49 So. 3d 869, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 19836, 2010 WL 5347527 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the circuit court’s order granting the father’s amended motion for transfer of venue of this custody and visitation case to Seminole County, where the father and minor child reside. We do not construe the order as also transferring to Seminole County the mother’s supplementary proceedings to enforce the money judgment entered against the father in Palm Beach County, because venue for such proceedings remains with the court that entered the judgment. See Kraft Foodservice, Inc. v. Thunder Boat Row & Assocs., Inc., 700 So.2d 181, 182 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997); Schwartz v. Capital City [870]*870First Nat’l Bank, 365 So.2d 181, 183 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978).

Affirmed.

GROSS, C.J., STEVENSON and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the circuit court’s order granting the father’s amended motion for transfer of venue of this custody and visitation case to Seminole County, where the father and minor child reside. We do not construe the order as also transferring to Seminole County the mother’s supplementary proceedings to enforce the money judgment entered against the father in Palm Beach County, because venue for such proceedings remains with the court that entered the judgment. See Kraft Foodservice, Inc. v. Thunder Boat Row & Assocs., Inc., 700 So.2d 181, 182 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997); Schwartz v. Capital City [870]*870First Nat’l Bank, 365 So.2d 181, 183 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978).

Affirmed.

GROSS, C.J., STEVENSON and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 So. 3d 869, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 19836, 2010 WL 5347527, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hughes-v-wilkerson-fladistctapp-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack