Hughes v. United States

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Washington

Hughes v. United States

86 F. 1022, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 3008

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Washington

DecidedApril 19, 1898

StatusPublished

This text of 86 F. 1022 (Hughes v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hughes v. United States, 86 F. 1022, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 3008 (circtdwa 1898).

Pincite

Opinion

HANFORD, District Judge.

This is an action by Joseph H. Hughes, ex-receiver of the United States district land office for the district of Spokane, to recover money paid by him for rent of offices occupied and used by him and by the register during his term of office ending April 17, 1894. The fees earned during each year of said term were largely in excess of the maximum allowed by law for compensation of the register and receiver and all expenses of the office, but, on the ground of insufficiency of the appropriations to pay incidental expenses, the department refused to honor requisitions which were made from time to time to pay office rent. The facts bring the case fully within ■ the rule of law in the case of U. S. v. Swiggett, 27 C. C. A. 465, 83 Fed. 97, except that in this case the claim includes money- expended more than six years prior to the date of commencing the action. The act authorizing the bring'-ing of suits against the government of the United States (1 Supp. Rev. St. [2d Ed.] 559) contains a proviso “that no suit against the government of the United States shall be allowed under this act unless the same shall have been brought within six years after the right accrued for which the claim is made.” On this ground the court disallows the claim as to all money paid prior to August 1, 1891. Upon the authority of the decision of the circuit court of appeals for the Ninth circuit in the case above cited, a judgment will be entered in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of $917, that being the amount actually paid, within a period of six years prior to the date of commencing this suit, for office rent from the 1st day of August, 1891, to and including April 17, 1894. Said judgment will bear interest at the rate of 4 per- cent, per annum from this date until paid, and the plaintiff is awarded the amount of costs taxable under the statute.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HANFORD, District Judge.

This is an action by Joseph H. Hughes, ex-receiver of the United States district land office for the district of Spokane, to recover money paid by him for rent of offices occupied and used by him and by the register during his term of office ending April 17, 1894. The fees earned during each year of said term were largely in excess of the maximum allowed by law for compensation of the register and receiver and all expenses of the office, but, on the ground of insufficiency of the appropriations to pay incidental expenses, the department refused to honor requisitions which were made from time to time to pay office rent. The facts bring the case fully within ■ the rule of law in the case of U. S. v. Swiggett, 27 C. C. A. 465, 83 Fed. 97, except that in this case the claim includes money- expended more than six years prior to the date of commencing the action. The act authorizing the bring'-ing of suits against the government of the United States (1 Supp. Rev. St. [2d Ed.] 559) contains a proviso “that no suit against the government of the United States shall be allowed under this act unless the same shall have been brought within six years after the right accrued for which the claim is made.” On this ground the court disallows the claim as to all money paid prior to August 1, 1891. Upon the authority of the decision of the circuit court of appeals for the Ninth circuit in the case above cited, a judgment will be entered in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of $917, that being the amount actually paid, within a period of six years prior to the date of commencing this suit, for office rent from the 1st day of August, 1891, to and including April 17, 1894. Said judgment will bear interest at the rate of 4 per- cent, per annum from this date until paid, and the plaintiff is awarded the amount of costs taxable under the statute.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

86 F. 1022, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 3008, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hughes-v-united-states-circtdwa-1898.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack