Hughes v. Timko
This text of 729 N.W.2d 226 (Hughes v. Timko) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Theron E. HUGHES, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Arthur TIMKO, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the motion for leave to file a brief amicus curiae is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the February 28, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the *227 February 28, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals and we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of Garcetti v. Ceballos, 547 U.S. ___, 126 S.Ct. 1951, 164 L.Ed.2d 689 (2006).
We do not retain jurisdiction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
729 N.W.2d 226, 477 Mich. 1086, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hughes-v-timko-mich-2007.