Hughes v. Stewart

74 Ga. 827, 1885 Ga. LEXIS 423
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMarch 10, 1885
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 74 Ga. 827 (Hughes v. Stewart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hughes v. Stewart, 74 Ga. 827, 1885 Ga. LEXIS 423 (Ga. 1885).

Opinion

Jackson, Chief Justice.

[Hughes and Stewart farmed together, or Stewart “worked with” Hughes, on halves, during the year 1883. Hughes furnished the land and stock and fed the stock. Stewart did the work. They were to divide the crop equally. Hughes furnished Stewart supplies, as plaintiff claimed. Defendant contested the alleged debt. The crop was divided, each taking his half. There was no agreement that Stewart’s half of the crop should belong to Hughes until supplies were paid for, but Hughes “ thought the law made Stewart’s half of the crop his (Hughes’s) until supplies were paid for.” Hughes brought trover for the crop in order to collect this debt. The justice decided in favor of Hughes. Stewart appealed to a jury. The jury gavea verdict for$41.15 in favor of Hughes. Stewart took the case by certiorari to the superior court. The judge of the superior court, considering it a question of law only, sustained the certiorari, and gave final judgment, basing his-ruling on the ground that the 'evidence did not show title m Hughes. Hughes excepted.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bowles v. Bowles
29 S.E. 35 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1897)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
74 Ga. 827, 1885 Ga. LEXIS 423, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hughes-v-stewart-ga-1885.