Hughes v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Hughes v. State

692 S.W.2d 64, 1985 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1260

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedMarch 20, 1985

DocketNo. 812-84

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 692 S.W.2d 64 (Hughes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hughes v. State, 692 S.W.2d 64, 1985 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1260 (Tex. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION ON REFUSAL OF APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

PER CURIAM.

Under a heading, “SELECTIVE PROSECUTION,” the published opinion of the Austin Court of Appeals somewhat cryptically states:

“Further the evidence from the statement of facts clearly shows that since McWilliams [v. State, 634 S.W.2d 815] supra, with the abandonment of the carving doctrine, multiple charges can be filed in a single criminal episode involving a single victim.”

Hughes v. State, 673 S.W.2d 654, 659 (Tex.App.—Austin 1984), petition refused.

The above quoted statement should be read in light of opinions of this Court in Drake v. State, 686 S.W.2d 935 (Tex.Cr.App.1985) and Ex parte Siller, 686 S.W.2d 617 (Tex.Cr.App.1985), both delivered February 27, 1985.

The petition for discretionary review is refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI